Should there be a minimum value for property developers buying up property? - property developers scotland
The developers are capable of meeting the acquisition of property on the market for first time buyers. Real estate developers should have the opportunity to buy goods at a given value, eg £ 150 - £ 200,000 pounds sterling
Monday, January 11, 2010
Property Developers Scotland Should There Be A Minimum Value For Property Developers Buying Up Property?
6 comments:
This is not a communist country ... The developers are not the reason for 1 Time buyers do not buy the property ...
1. Time buyers have difficulty bcoz property is assessed by the cheap credit dried up ... Now the banks are ready, 20-30% 1 buyers drop ... Again, it can not initiate this type of deposit ... Personally, I blame the banks .. is through the prices rise too high, which can pple with bad credit to obtain mortgages to enable the people to commit fraud in the mortgage ISM fall ... and prices of many young people do not .... and punish Offer for 1st Time buyers, which has large deposits to reduce the risk and the banks, after the horse has .... screwed to minimize
Although developers buy say that you pple at 250K like most young people in London, you can find a deposit of 25% on a house ... 200K, the prices will fall, but also that the house prices and more new faces on the scale ... This would help developers continue to buy homes ... But the situation in which the 1st Time buyer? even though the house and fell 200K to 150K .. The 1st Time that Buyer 25% offers up to 150K ?????
I believe that the government had anything goes too far left, there is little or no opportunity to buy here, the young can not understand how to solve the starting price for the new building! very small country, there beside the head of you, they make money from each piece of land, the materials are not expensive, profit margins must be solid, sub-contractors must be proposed to bind to link to this job? Somebodys sitting on a pile of money and very happy, thank you very much. This is the country that should not be sold to them, maybe the government to consolidate the plans and pay the people what is actually built! To living persons who intend not to buy, to rent, too, etc. ..... Everything is a disaster.
I recently visited areas of French research and barns of the land, 100,000.00, was a beautiful house with you, and I'll have to do this summer, slippers, finding accommodation for a few Euros 80,000.00, with a small land and a barn to renovate in the spare time ........ and climate, wine and fresh air, and AHow to speak French book will be the end of the day.
I believe that the government had anything goes too far left, there is little or no opportunity to buy here, the young can not understand how to solve the starting price for the new building! very small country, there beside the head of you, they make money from each piece of land, the materials are not expensive, profit margins must be solid, sub-contractors must be proposed to bind to link to this job? Somebodys sitting on a pile of money and very happy, thank you very much. This is the country that should not be sold to them, maybe the government to consolidate the plans and pay the people what is actually built! To living persons who intend not to buy, to rent, too, etc. ..... Everything is a disaster.
I recently visited areas of French research and barns of the land, 100,000.00, was a beautiful house with you, and I'll have to do this summer, slippers, finding accommodation for a few Euros 80,000.00, with a small land and a barn to renovate in the spare time ........ and climate, wine and fresh air, and AHow to speak French book will be the end of the day.
There are many problems with this idea.
1. Define promoter, for example, if someone buy a bigger house to get an idea of small businesses.
2. If someone buys a house for a family member, children or elderly parents are a real estate developer.
3. Do not think that the government has asked to buy the rent for the first, satisfy the need for social rented and the burden on communities and put in the hands of small entrepreneurs.
4. What, a developer wrong anyway. You invest and win it can, as in the last 9 years, or lose like 9 years ago. And if they start to have to be, with little or prefer this type of business in the hands of large corporations, start effected through the lower boundary.
5. By limiting the market for cheaper goods that are cheap, continue to hurt the sellers of these properties to sell in the phasing out of the owners, which may rob them of Peter to pay Paul.
Edit.Bizzy, free from taxes, which could benefit for developers is already heavy Gapital gains tax can also add the stamp tax for people to purchase his right, unless you make it easy for a loss, what will you do, then type a tax credit of stamp?
Some people see someone that compares with a profit simply because the luck to have bought the right place at the right time and they are the only ones crying. Jealousy, greed, and impotence. If you do not try to bring them to those who can. sad sad sad.
And where did that buy their houses at 2 1. until they think Time to find a buyer for the payment?
1. Buyers have to do the same chances of cheap goods, the developers - who will not buy most of them do the work, they want to do everything and not yet in possession of deposits 9 of ten! Save for deposit and bid - do exactly as the developers - what we did!
The price does not really help - many for the first time "properties already in / on this level. I think there should be a very high tax on the business of buying a property: it must start with the stamp tax. Why should they leave the payment of 1% on purchases, but profits? The only exception should be about, not rent-regulated businesses, non-profit, a sort of social housing.
Post a Comment